Handling blocking operations in Akka HTTP
Sometimes it is difficult to avoid performing the blocking operations and there are good chances that the blocking is done inside a Future execute, which may lead to problems. It is important to handle the blocking operations correctly.
Problem
Using context.dispatcher
as the dispatcher on which the blocking Future
executes, can be a problem. The same dispatcher is used by the routing
infrastructure to actually handle the incoming requests.
If all of the available threads are blocked, the routing infrastructure will end up starving. Therefore, routing infrastructure should not be blocked. Instead, a dedicated dispatcher for blocking operations should be used.
注釈
Blocking APIs should also be avoided if possible. Try to find or build Reactive APIs, such that blocking is minimised, or moved over to dedicated dispatchers.
Often when integrating with existing libraries or systems it is not possible to avoid blocking APIs, then following solution explains how to handle blocking operations properly.
Note that the same hints apply to managing blocking operations anywhere in Akka, including in Actors etc.
In the below thread state diagrams the colours have the following meaning:
- Turquoise - Sleeping state
- Orange - Waiting state
- Green - Runnable state
The thread information was recorded using the YourKit profiler, however any good JVM profiler has this feature (including the free and bundled with the Oracle JDK VisualVM as well as Oracle Flight Recorder).
Problem example: blocking the default dispatcher
// BAD (due to blocking in Future, on default dispatcher)
implicit val defaultDispatcher = system.dispatcher
val routes: Route = post {
complete {
Future { // uses defaultDispatcher
Thread.sleep(5000) // will block on default dispatcher,
System.currentTimeMillis().toString // Starving the routing infrastructure
}
}
}
Here the app is exposed to load of continous GET requests and large number of akka.actor.default-dispatcher threads are handling requests. The orange portion of the thread shows that they are idle. Idle threads are fine, they're ready to accept new work. However large amounts of Turquoise (sleeping) threads are very bad!
After some time, the app is exposed to the load of requesting POST requests,
which will block these threads. For example "default-akka.default-dispatcher2,3,4
"
are going into the blocking state, after being idle before. It can be observed
that the number of new threads increase, "default-akka.actor.default-dispatcher 18,19,20,...
"
however they go to sleep state immediately, thus wasting the
resources.
The number of such new threads depend on the default dispatcher configuration, but likely will not exceed 50. Since many POST requests are done, the entire thread pool is starved. The blocking operations dominate such that the routing infra has no thread available to handle the other requests.
In essence, the Thread.sleep
has dominated all threads and caused anything
executing on the default dispatcher to starve for resources (including any Actors
that you have not configured an explicit dispatcher for (sic!)).
Solution: Dedicated dispatcher for blocking operations
In application.conf
, the dispatcher dedicated for blocking behaviour should
be configured as follows:
my-blocking-dispatcher {
type = Dispatcher
executor = "thread-pool-executor"
thread-pool-executor {
// or in Akka 2.4.2+
fixed-pool-size = 16
}
throughput = 100
}
There are many dispatcher options available which can be found in ディスパッチャ.
Here thread-pool-executor
is used, which has a hard limit of threads, it can
keep available for blocking operations. The size settings depend on the app
functionality and the number of cores the server has.
Whenever blocking has to be done, use the above configured dispatcher instead of the default one:
// GOOD (the blocking is now isolated onto a dedicated dispatcher):
implicit val blockingDispatcher = system.dispatchers.lookup("my-blocking-dispatcher")
val routes: Route = post {
complete {
Future { // uses the good "blocking dispatcher" that we configured,
// instead of the default dispatcher- the blocking is isolated.
Thread.sleep(5000)
System.currentTimeMillis().toString
}
}
}
This forces the app to use the same load, initially normal requests and then the blocking requests. The thread pool behaviour is shown in the figrue.
Initially, the normal requests are easily handled by default dispatcher, the green lines, which represents the actual execution.
When blocking operations are issued, the my-blocking-dispatcher
starts up to the number of configured threads. It handles sleeping. After
certain period of nothing happening to the threads, it shuts them down.
If another bunch of operations have to be done, the pool will start new threads that will take care of putting them into sleep state, but the threads are not wasted.
In this case, the throughput of the normal GET requests are not impacted they were still served on the default dispatcher.
This is the recommended way of dealing with any kind of blocking in reactive applications. It is referred as "bulkheading" or "isolating" the bad behaving parts of an app. In this case, bad behaviour of blocking operations.
There is good documentation availabe in Akka docs section, Blocking needs careful management.
Contents